| 
 GSI 
FRS 
  
  
  
 |  | 
 Production 
of secondary beams of exotic nuclei 
  
Introduction 
Secondary-beam production 
Estimation 
of production rates  
  
In nature, 
only 287 primordial nuclides exist. These are the nuclei 
that can be found in natural sources. It is supposed that about 6000 nuclei are 
supposed to "exist" in the sense that they live much longer than the time a 
nucleon takes to cross the nucleus with its Fermi velocity (t >> 10-22 
s). Only about half of them have 
been observed up to now. Most of 
the unobserved nuclides are neutron-rich. 
 
The limitation to projectiles of primordial nuclides is a severe restriction to 
the study of the properties of exotic nuclei. 
Experiments with secondary 
(or radioactive) beams are an important tool to explore 
different properties of nuclei far off stability. Particular interest to 
produce neutron-rich nuclei and to reach the nuclei involved in the 
astrophysical r-process. The
scientific motivation for studying reactions with exotic 
nuclei is described extensively in various reports in the context of 
next-generation facilities (see e.g.
FAIR,
RIBF,
EURISOL). 
There are 
several reaction meachanisms that can be used to produce secondary beams: 
    | 
   
  Neutron capture 
  A direct way to produce 
  neutron-rich nuclides is neutron capture. Most of the heavier nuclear species 
  in the universe have been produced in cosmic scenarios by this reaction 
  mechanism. Roughly two scenarios are considered according to the magnitude of 
  the neutron flux. The s process ("slow" process) evolves close to the valley 
  of beta stability. Since the time delay between two consecutive capture 
  reactions is longer than most of the beta half-lives, the beta-unstable 
  capture product decays, before the next neutron is captured. The r process 
  ("rapid" process) evolves far from the valley of beta stability. The time 
  between two consecutive capture reactions is smaller than the beta half-lives 
  of the nuclei close to beta stability. 
  The application of neutron capture in laboratory under controlled conditions 
  for the production of very neutron-rich nuclei is not possible, because too 
  high neutron fluxes would be needed. A technical application, with or without 
  explicit intention, is the production of plutonium and minor actinides (actinides 
  with small production yields) in fission reactors. They are formed by 
  consecutive neutron capture and beta decay from 238U nuclei. 
  However, the production follows closely the valley of beta stability. 
   |  
    | 
   Fusion 
  Two nuclei, gently brought into 
  contact, may fuse due to the attractive nuclear forces. For lighter systems, 
  this is the most important reaction mechanism at energies close to the Coulomb 
  barrier. In very heavy systems, however, the Coulomb force tends to 
  destabilise the merged system so that they re-separate immediately with higher 
  probability. 
  Fusion reactions, in particular using heavy-ion beams, have proven to be well 
  suited for the production of proton-rich nuclei up to the proton drip line. 
  They have been an important tool for exploring the properties of exotic nuclei 
  on the neutron-deficient side of the chart of the nuclides. Furthermore, 
  fusion is the only tool applied to produce super-heavy elements. 
  Since the nucleons of projectile and target just add up, the nuclear 
  composition of the fusion product is well defined. Only the evaporation 
  process leads to a loss of a few nucleons. 
  Due to the curvature of the line of beta-stability, fusion is not suited for 
  the production of neutron-rich nuclides. Another draw-back of fusion reactions 
  is the low beam energy required which only allows for the application of thin 
  targets, because the energy of the projectiles would become too low in a 
  thicker target due to electronic interactions. Therefore, only a very small 
  fraction of the projectiles goes into nuclear reactions, thus 
  resulting in low intensities of secondary beams. 
   |  
    | 
   Fission 
  Fission can be considered in some sense as the reverse of fusion. Here the 
  process starts from heavy rather neutron-rich nuclei. As a consequence, the 
  fission products  are normally situated on the 
  neutron-rich side of the chart of nuclides. The production of nuclides which 
  are more neutron rich than the fissioning system is only possible due to 
  charge polarisation, that means that the two fission fragments are formed with 
  different N-over-Z ratios. Fluctuation phenomena as well shell effects might 
  be responsible for charge polarisation. However, the restoring force due to 
  the nuclear asymmetry energy is very strong. This limits the polarisation to 
  rather low values. 
  Most fission fragments are formed with appreciable excitation energies, 
  leading to neutron evaporation very shortly after fission. Therefore, the 
  average N-over-Z ratio of the fission fragments is below the value of the 
  fissioning nucleus. 
   |  
    | 
   
  Fragmentation 
  Nuclear collisions at bombarding 
  energies well above the Fermi energy can be considered as quasi-free 
  nucleon-nucleon collisions. The collisions essentially remove a number of 
  nucleons from the projectile respectively target nucleus. Collisions at large 
  impact parameters are an interesting tool for the production of exotic 
  nuclides. We use the term fragmentation for these reactions in which a large 
  part of the projectile respectively target survives. This should not be 
  confounded with multi-fragmentation in which very light nuclei are produced at 
  more central collisions. 
  An important feature of fragmentation reactions is the strong 
  statistical fluctuation. This leads to large variations in the N-over-Z ratio 
  of the reaction products. Also the energy induced in the collision is subject 
  to a large fluctuation and extends to rather high values. Therefore, the 
  consecutive evaporation cascade has an important influence on the nuclear 
  composition of the fragmentation products observed. 
  Fragmentation is a mechanism which produces a large number of nuclides, 
  scattered over an extended region of the chart of the nuclides.   |  
 
These different mechanisms are 
used (or will be used) in two types of facilities: ISOL-type or in-flight-type. 
In ISOL-type facilities, the secondary beams are produced as a target residues. 
Consequently, the wanted beam particels have to be extracted from the target, 
ionized and accelerated to needed energy. On the other hand, in in-flight-type 
facilities, the secondary beams are produced as projectile residues, and, 
therefore, the efforts for beam preparations are much smaller. 
Below, the 
list of existing or planned radioactive-beam facilities 
is given (a more
    complete list is available on the EURISOL
    page) 
    
    I. Existing facilities 
    ANL/ATLAS
    (Argonne, USA) 
    GANIL (Grand
    accélérateur national d'ions lourds, Caen, France) 
    GSI (Gesellschaft
    für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) 
    ISAC/TRIUMF
    (Canada's National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics,
    Canada)   
    ISOLDE/CERN
    (Geneva, Switzerland) 
    NSCL
    (National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at Michigan State University,
    USA) 
    ORNL/HRIBF
    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory / Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility,
    USA) 
    RIKEN (RI
    Beam Factory, Japan) 
    Texas A&M (Cyclotron
    Institute, USA)    
    
    TWINSOL
    (Dual Solenoid Project, University of Notre Dame, USA) 
    II. Projects 
    
    
  FAIR 
  (GSI
    future project) (An International Accelerator Facility, Darmstadt,
    Germany) 
    Official RIA website (Rare
    Isotope Accelerator, USA) - RIA website of ANL 
    - RIA website of MSU    
    EURISOL
    (European Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Nuclear Beam Facility,
    Europe) 
    SPIRAL
    II (Système de Production d'Ions Radioactifs en Ligne, Caen,
    France) 
    SIRIUS (Radioactive Beams for
    Science and Medicine, Daresbury, Great Britain) 
    
    SPES (Study for the Production
    of Exotic Species, Legnaro, Italy) 
Our group is involved in 
estimated the intensities of secondary beams at the future facilities: 
FAIR 
at GSI and 
EURISOL. 
Details can be found here: 
Some of this work is also 
summarized in the following publications: 
 
"SECONDARY-BEAM 
PRODUCTION: PROTONS VERUS HEAVY IONS"   
M. V. Ricciardi, S. Lukic, 
A. Kelic, 
K.-H. Schmidt, M. Veselsky 
Contribution to the Proceedings The 
Seventh International Conference on Radioactive Nuclear Beams RNB7, July 3-7, 
2006, Cortina d'Ampezzo (Italy); to be 
published by European Physical Journal A 
"STUDIES ON THE BENIFIT OF EXTENDED 
CAPABILITIES OF THE DRIVER ACCELERATOR FOR EURISOL" 
K.-H. Schmidt, A. Kelic, S. Lukic, M. V. Ricciardi, M. Veselsky 
accepted in Phys. Rev. ST AB 
"SYSTEMATIC
COMPARISON OF ISOLDE-SC YIELDS WITH CALCULATED IN-TARGET PRODUCTION RATES" 
S. Lukic, F. Gevaert, A. Kelic, M. V. Ricciardi, K.-H. Schmidt, O. Yordanov 
Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 
565 (2006) 784-800,
arXiv nucl-ex/0601031  
 
"MODEL CALCULATIONS OF A TWO-STEP
REACTION SCHEME FOR THE PRODUCTION OF NEUTRON-RICH SECONDARY BEAMS" 
 K. Helariutta,
J. Benlliure, M. V. Ricciardi, K.-H. Schmidt 
Eur. Phys. J. A 17 (2003) 181-193 
/ arXiv nucl-ex/0302008 
  
 
  
  
  
  |